WANT OF JURISDICTION
No matter what the system does or says, they can never actually have or acquire jurisdiction over any living soul. The living man/woman I.E. soul can never fall under their jurisdiction ever for the following reasons.
- Man created the fictional characters of the public servants, courts and judges. Man is the supreme authority over what he creates. Our spiritual founding fathers state that: There can be no right against that which the right depends.
- The system uses presumption and assumption of jurisdiction in a silent manner where there is absolutely no disclosure of the facts that the system is making an assumption of your status where you suddenly exist under them. Because they are doing this in silence they are in fact going against their own laws of contracts, where it says that an undisclosed agreement is void if all parties are not in full agreement to the terms of the contract. This is nothing more than a twisting of the mind to force themselves upon that which they have no right over.
- The only way a living man can give up his Sovereignty, as a living soul is to actually speak the words that gives his own authority over to another thing such as a public servant. OR if he makes a contract that specifically states he has allowed someone else to take control of him and his affairs to be handled by a fictional character and where he has signed this contract in full knowledge and willingness of the relinquish of Sovereignty. A state privilege is a contract but it is not a contract that specifically says that accepting this or that from the state or the feds that the living man agrees to give up his Sovereignty. Just because he accepted something from a fictional agency doesn_t mean that he is willing to relinquish his Sovereignty or control of himself to another. There is no mention of this and so it is not a part of the privilege or any undisclosed contract that can be assumed by any public servant. Walking into a courtroom as a Sovereign the man actually remains the Sovereign. The courts assume that you have given them jurisdiction in silence upon entrance when the man did not give away anything at all. This assumption is the fraud of the fictional system and is totally against everything God stands for in the spiritual world of the living soul. This is a twisting of the mind and facts as they really stand in the kingdom of God at all times no matter what. The courts are always in existence in the kingdom of God at all times too. Now for a catch 22, if a man were to give up his Sovereignty to a court or a public servant what would happen. The answer is absolutely nothing. The reason is that a fictional character requires a living being to animate it or it will just lay dormant. So you see when you do give your Sovereignty over to those that say they are public servants you are actually giving it to another living man or woman who is equal to you in every way and thus is unable to judge you in Gods kingdom. More about this below
- These assumptions are actually being made by other humans of equal free will as all the rest of us, but they are doing a dark deed against the rights of others when they do this so KARMA is created by them for doing so. These dark deeds are acted out from a fictional character standpoint where the fiction is actually beneath the living soul. The living man who dons the robes of the fictional character is in fact working against others on purpose, which is actually just working against themselves under the rules of KARMA. They will have to rebalance this KARMA on their own at a later time before they can evolve as required and decreed by God. Even the courts stand in the kingdom of God as nothing can exist outside of that kingdom, if it could get out it would just disappear entirely because all matter in the universe is bound together by the energy of the all that is I.E. God.
- Assumption can never create a right by someone else over another. Hidden assumptions in accepting a privilege from any fictional character such as a state or federal agency does not constitute a valid contract where the Sovereign gave up his Sovereignty on purpose to a fictional character or public servant. Mere want of jurisdiction does not create jurisdiction and never can.
- All who stand in there own truth as a Sovereign may come under fire or threat of loss of something from the fictional systems but they are just using force to take and keep control over others. This force is actually just proof that they know they have no jurisdiction over the living but they are trying to maintain the illusion that they do have this authority but actually do not and they know it. God never gave another man the right or ability to judge his brothers and sisters. It says that Judge not thy neighbor in the words of the holy scripts. In the words of the master Jesus it says: "Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye? Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye? Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye. Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you." (Matthew 7:1-6).
"Therefore thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest: for wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself; for thou that judgest doest the same things" (Romans 2:1). Is it so, that there is not a wise man among you? no, not one that shall be able to judge between his brethren? But brother goeth to law with brother, and that before the unbelievers. Now therefore there is utterly a fault among you, because ye go to law one with another. (I Corinthians 6:1,4-7)
Scripture is explicit: taking another Christian or living man to court is an "utter failure." What, then, should we as believers do when we have disputes that normally call for litigation? Paul recommends that we take the matter before wise believers who can make a judgment (I Corinthians 5:3-5; I Corinthians 6:4-5). But suppose we can't arrange that? Then Paul says it would be better to "accept wrong" than to go before unbelievers for judgment. Why? Well, because the court system doesn't base their decisions on what the Bible says but rather opinion. Remember, the Bible tells us that "judgment must begin at the house of God" (I Peter 4:17).
Moreover
if thy brother shall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between
thee and him alone: if he shall hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother. But if
he will not hear thee, then take with thee one or two more, that in the mouth of
two or three witnesses every word may be established. And if he shall neglect to
hear them, tell it unto the church: but if he neglect to hear the church, let
him be unto thee as a heathen man and a publican" (Matthew 18:15-17).
The Bible tells us that we are called to judge reputed prophets by their fruits:
"Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them. (Matthew 7:16-20).
These passages are saying that those that go against the
free will of another are making a judgment upon them and that is not acceptable
in the kingdom of God. We all live in the kingdom of God but some are dark in
there souls and do not see what they are doing to themselves or to any one else.
KARMA will require they be rendered into situations that bring up there
imbalances from their past deeds and settle them before moving up the ladder of
evolution. The fault is that we as men have turned to laws to judge one another
but God has said that to do this is a fault of our discernment between men of
equal free will, where no one can make a judgment upon another brother of equal
free will.
Taking into account for today all that was taught over
2000 years ago still holds true today if interpreted from the way they spoke
back then to the way, we speak today. All in all no man has a right to judge his
brothers and sisters and we are all brothers and sisters of equal free will and
equal rights. However the corrupt souls working against the rest of the world
for total domination don_t see things in the light of truth they only see the
profit they can gain from world domination and slavery of mankind into their
will.
In Service to Humanity for the Light of
Truth
Lightworker
Joseph Collins